Skip to main content
Mixed Number Calculator

Reference

Worked Examples

Five fully worked mixed number and fraction problems, one for each operation plus a plain conversion, each broken into the same numbered steps used throughout this site. Read through a few, then type your own numbers into the calculator alongside them and watch the same style of working build in real time — no button required.

Live — updates as you type

Type the whole number, numerator, and denominator into their own fields. For a negative value such as −2 3/4, use the sign toggle or type −2 in the whole-number field.

Result

View step-by-step working

    Getting Started

    How to Use These Examples

    Start by reading the problem statement alone — the two mixed numbers or fractions and the operation between them — before looking at a single step of working. Decide for yourself what the denominator, if any, needs to become, and roughly what the answer should look like. Only then move into the numbered steps, one at a time, in order, rather than skipping down to the boxed result at the bottom to see if you were right.

    The most useful way to work through any single step is to cover everything below it, predict what that line should say based on the step before it, and only then reveal it to check yourself. This turns a worked example from something you passively read into something you actively test yourself against — and it makes it obvious, immediately, which specific step in the method you don't yet have solid.

    If your own attempt lands on a different final answer than the example, resist the urge to restart the whole problem from scratch. Instead, work backward: compare your scratch work against the example one step at a time, starting from the first step, until you find the exact line where the two diverge. That line is almost always where the real mistake happened, even though the wrong numerator or denominator might not have looked wrong until several steps later.

    Once you can predict every step of an example correctly before revealing it, the example itself has done its job — that's the point to move on to a fresh problem with different numbers, ideally using the calculator above to check a problem you invent yourself.

    Example 1 — Addition

    Adding Mixed Numbers with Unlike Denominators

    Worked Example — 2 3/4 + 1 5/6

    This is the example to study first, because mismatched denominators are the single most common stumbling block in fraction addition — nothing can be added until both fractions describe pieces of the same size.

    1. Find the LCD of the two denominators

      of 4 and 6: the LCD is 12

    2. Rewrite each fraction over 12

      3/4 → 9/12, and 5/6 → 10/12

    3. Add the fractions

      9/12 + 10/12 = 19/12 = 1 7/12

    4. Add the whole numbers, plus the carry

      2 + 1 = 3, plus the extra whole unit from 19/12, giving 4 7/12

    2 3/4 + 1 5/6 = 4 7/12

    MULTIPLES OF 4 4 8 12 16 MULTIPLES OF 6 6 12 18 24
    Multiples of 4 and 6, with the first shared value circled — that's the LCD both fractions get rewritten over.

    Example 2 — Subtraction

    Subtracting Mixed Numbers That Require Borrowing

    Worked Example — 6 1/5 − 2 4/5

    Borrowing is where most subtraction mistakes happen, because it's the one case where you can't just work left to right — you have to notice ahead of time that the fraction part will run short, and regroup before subtracting anything.

    1. Compare the numerators

      1/5 is smaller than 4/5, so borrowing is needed

    2. Borrow one whole from 6

      6 1/5 → 5 + 5/5 + 1/5 = 5 6/5

    3. Subtract the whole numbers

      5 − 2 = 3

    4. Subtract the numerators

      6/5 − 4/5 = 2/5

    5. Combine

      3 + 2/5 = 3 2/5

    6 1/5 − 2 4/5 = 3 2/5

    Example 3 — Multiplication

    Multiplying Two Mixed Numbers

    Worked Example — 1 3/4 × 2 2/3

    Multiplication looks similar to addition at a glance, but it drops the common-denominator step entirely and instead demands converting both mixed numbers to improper fractions first — skipping that conversion is the fastest way to get this type of problem wrong.

    1. Convert to improper fractions

      1 3/4 → 7/4, and 2 2/3 → 8/3

    2. Multiply the numerators

      7 × 8 = 56

    3. Multiply the denominators

      4 × 3 = 12

    4. Simplify with the GCF

      56/12 → GCF 4 → 14/3

    5. Convert back to a mixed number

      14/3 = 4 2/3

    1 3/4 × 2 2/3 = 4 2/3

    Example 4 — Conversion

    Converting an Improper Fraction to a Mixed Number

    Worked Example — 47/6

    Every other example on this page ends with this exact conversion, so this one isolates it on its own: dividing the numerator by the denominator to see precisely where the whole number and the leftover fraction each come from.

    1. Divide the numerator by the denominator

      47 ÷ 6 = 7 remainder 5

    2. The quotient becomes the whole number

      7

    3. The remainder becomes the new numerator

      5/6

    4. Combine

      7 5/6

    47/6 = 7 5/6

    Example 5 — Division

    Dividing Mixed Numbers by Flipping and Multiplying

    Worked Example — 3 1/2 ÷ 1 1/4

    Division is the operation most often confused with multiplication, since both start with the exact same improper-fraction conversion — the only difference is the extra flip applied to the second fraction before multiplying.

    1. Convert to improper fractions

      3 1/2 → 7/2, and 1 1/4 → 5/4

    2. Flip the second fraction

      5/4 → 4/5

    3. Multiply straight across

      7/2 × 4/5 = 28/10

    4. Simplify with the GCF

      28/10 → GCF 2 → 14/5

    5. Convert back to a mixed number

      14/5 = 2 4/5

    3 1/2 ÷ 1 1/4 = 2 4/5

    Common Mistakes

    Common Mistakes When Studying Examples

    Questions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Questions about learning from worked examples, not the mechanics of any single operation.

    What should I do if my own answer doesn't match a worked example?

    Don't start over from scratch — instead, walk back through your own scratch work one step at a time and compare it against the same step in the example. The first line where the two disagree is almost always where the actual mistake happened, even if the wrong answer only became obvious several lines later. Working backward from the answer this way finds the error far faster than redoing the whole problem.

    Is it better to predict each step before reading it, or read the whole example through first?

    Predicting first is the more useful habit, even though reading straight through feels faster. Cover everything below the problem statement, decide what the very next line of working should be, then reveal just that step and check yourself. It takes longer per example, but it tells you honestly whether you understand the method or have only recognized the numbers.

    How many worked examples should I go through before trying practice problems on my own?

    As a rough guide, once you can predict every step of an example correctly before revealing it, you're ready to try a similar problem unaided. That might happen after one example for an operation you already know reasonably well, or after several for one that still feels unfamiliar — the point where prediction stops being a guess is the real signal, not a fixed count.