Reduction
Reduce to Lowest Terms
Reduce any fraction to lowest terms using the Euclidean algorithm — a repeated division routine that finds the greatest common factor of the numerator and denominator without ever listing a prime factor. Type a fraction and watch each division step and the final GCF update instantly.
Fraction
Result
View step-by-step working
Method
The Euclidean Algorithm, Step by Step
Worked Example — 48/18
Divide the larger number by the smaller and keep only the remainder. Then divide the previous divisor by that remainder. Repeat until the remainder hits 0 — the last divisor you used is the GCF.
-
Divide the larger by the smaller
48 = 2 × 18 + 12
-
Repeat with the smaller pair
18 = 1 × 12 + 6
-
Repeat again — remainder hits 0
12 = 2 × 6 + 0
-
The last nonzero remainder is the GCF
GCF(48, 18) = 6
48/18 ÷ 6 = 8/3
More Examples
The Algorithm Across Different Fraction Shapes
The same repeated-division routine handles every case below without any special-casing.
Already in lowest terms
13/29 = 13/29
29 = 2×13 + 3, then 13 = 4×3 + 1, then 3 = 3×1 + 0. The GCF is 1, so nothing changes.
One number divides the other
51/17 = 3/1
51 = 3×17 + 0 — the remainder is 0 on the very first division, so the GCF is simply 17.
Large numbers, still quick
12345/6789 = 4115/2263
Nine short division steps land on a GCF of 3 — far less work than trial-dividing either number by every prime up toward its square root.
Why It Matters
Why Reach for the Euclidean Algorithm
A fraction is in lowest terms once its numerator and denominator share no common factor above 1 — 8/3 can't be reduced any further because 8 and 3 have nothing in common. Getting there requires finding the greatest common factor first, and the Euclidean algorithm is one of two standard routes to that number. Instead of breaking the numerator and denominator into their prime building blocks and comparing them, it repeatedly divides and keeps only the remainder — a fundamentally different question that happens to arrive at the identical answer every time.
That difference in approach is exactly what makes the algorithm worth learning on its own, not just as a curiosity alongside prime factorization. It never needs to know whether a number is prime, composite, or anything about its internal structure — only how two numbers divide against each other. That makes it dependable on numbers that are awkward or slow to factor by hand.
The number of division steps the algorithm needs grows very slowly as the inputs grow — roughly in step with how many digits the numbers have, not with the numbers themselves. Doubling a denominator from four digits to eight digits adds only a handful more divisions, whereas searching for prime factors by testing candidate primes gets measurably slower as the search range widens. That gap is the whole reason this method has stayed the standard choice for large numbers for well over two thousand years.
Every calculator on this site that reduces a fraction — including the one above — runs the same underlying division logic either way; only the displayed working steps change between the Euclidean view here and the prime-factorization view used elsewhere. The reduced fraction itself is never in question.
Common Mistakes
Where the Euclidean Algorithm Goes Wrong
Quick Reference
Fractions Reduced to Lowest Terms
Search or scroll this table for the lowest-terms form of frequently seen fraction pairs — useful for checking homework or double-checking a division-by-hand result.
Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions specific to the Euclidean algorithm, not already covered elsewhere on the site.